Skip to main content

Akali Dal lands in crisis as its legislature party leader refuses to vote for NDA presidential candidate questioning party decision, leadership

 



Crisis in Akali Dal deepens with first open challenge to leadership of Sukhbir S Badal

Ground Zero

Jagtar Singh

Chandigarh: Revolt has finally erupted against the leadership of Sukhbir Singh Badal under whose presidency  Shiromani Akali Dal, the oldest political party in the country constituted by the Indians, was reduced to just three seats, the worst performance ever, in the last Assembly elections.

The challenge to Sukhbir Singh Badal has been articulated by none other but one of the three party MLAs Manpreet Singh Ayali, who also heads this miniscule group that is Akali Dal Legislature Party.

He today announced boycott of presidential election saying he could not go by party decision to vote for BJP’s candidate D Murmu as the role of this party has been anti-Panth and anti-Punjab. At the same time, he asserted that going by historical reasons, the Congress candidate could not even be considered.

At the same time, he  raised the demand for change in leadership while logically articulating the arguments in support of his strategic decision and assertions and challenge.

Earlier, it was only Karnail Singh Panjoli, the general secretary of the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee, who has been raising the issue of change in leadership but not forcefully the way Ayali has done.

Ayali, in his video message, has underlined that the Akali Dal was constituted to take up issues and concerns of the Panth and not just confine itself to power politics. It is too well known that the Shiromani Akali Dal started distancing from the core Panthic and Akali concerns especially after 1997 when Parkash Singh Badal took over as the chief minister as militancy had already phased out but the issues relating to that period  started getting ignored. He had become president in 1995.

The House of Badals hegemonized the Akali affairs and the highest Sikh institutions in the process. At the same time, the party distanced itself from the issues not only those relating to militancy but also the legacy ones.

The worst was the handling of Bargari chain of incidents relating to sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib in 2015. The Badal government opted for those police officers who were associated with brazen human rights violations including the appointment of Sumedh Singh Saini as the police chief.

The Badals have not offered regret, what to talk of apology, for such decisions. The highest institutions like the sovereign Akal Takht and the SGPC were severely dented during this period.

The Akali Dal getting reduced to just three seats was the cumulative effect of the style of functioning and wrong priorities of the Badals.

Shiromani Akali Dal is not just a political party but one of the three institutions of the Sikhs, the other two being the Akal Takht and the SGPC, in that order. The Akali Dal has glorious history of struggles, both before and after independence. However, the Badals reduced it to a family controlled outfit with only objective being power. The Badals encouraged dynasties in the party to justify their own grip.

Sukhbir Singh Badal used to be hailed as poll strategist after 2007. If he was given the credit, he also should have own moral responsibility for humiliation of this historical outfit.

The Jhoonda committee that was constituted to go into the causes of defeat and recommend measures to rejuvenate it, met people in almost all districts and the main issue that people talked of was leadership change and return to Panthic agenda.

This report is yet to be discussed by the core committee of the party.

Now the volcano has  suddenly erupted with the decision by Ayali to boycott presidential poll while attacking Badals and their non-Panthic priorities over the years.

It may be recalled that as anger flared up following  implementation of the three farm laws that a year long agitation at the Delhi doorsteps forced Prime Minister Narendra Modi to withdraw, the Badals hailed these laws as pro-farmers. First to support these laws was Harsimrat Kaur Badal, then a minister in the Modi cabinet followed by her husband and Akali Dal chief Sukhbir Singh Badal the very next day. As these two leaders failed to mollify the farmers, Parkash Singh Badal too was brought in. at one time, farmers used to be the core support base of this party.

Parkash Singh Badal too lost in last Assembly election after creating a record of being the 5-time chief minister.

The Sikh affairs have entered a crucial phase as the next challenge is going to be election to the general house of the SGPC.

The Shiromani Akali Dal needs to be revived by then but that is not possible under the present leadership.

Not only the leadership has to change, the leadership that includes the core committee must apologise for the acts of omission and commission relating to Bargari, exoneration of Dera Sacha Sauda chief of blasphemy cases at the behest of Badals and the related issues.

The beginning should be made with leadership change.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio