Strategic polarisation by BJP
has potential to dislocate social secularism in Punjab
Jagtar Singh
Chandigarh: Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent visit to Dera Sachkhand Ballan in
the Doaba heartland—an area where Dalit social and religious formations wield
considerable influence—has once again revived the debate on the role of deras
in Punjab’s complex religio-political landscape. Punjab, a border state that
has historically witnessed alternating cycles of violent and remarkably
peaceful mobilisations over more than a century, continues to remain
politically sensitive and socially layered.
This is typical Punjab whose political
discourse has invariably been dictated by the Sikh religio-political discourse,
at least till recently. This dominant Panthic religio-political discourse has
now got fragmented over the period, thereby yielding space to new permutations
and combinations in the state’s religio-political matrix. It can safely be said
that Punjab is in a flux. The emergence of non-ideological Aam Aadmi Party is
an example of the changing but sensitive landscape
At the beginning itself, it may also
be emphasised that the social architecture of this otherwise sensitive border
state has been characterised by what can be termed as social secularism. This
is because of syncretic and humanistic content of the Sikh philosophy that is
non-discriminatory, contrary to the deeply caste based social structure in this
country. Arya Samaj, although this formation came into confrontation with the
Sikh thought at a later stage, too emerged in this landscape propagating
casteless society.
Reinforcing this logic of social
secularism is the fact that when Sikhs were killed and burnt alive and their
women raped in Delhi and several other places for days beginning November 1,
1984 following killing of prime minister Indira Gandhi, Punjabis exhibited
total unity with not even a single case of disturbance.
Modi’s visit to Dera Ballan assumes
all the more significance as Nayab Singh Saini, chief minister of neighbouring
state of Haryana has of late been playing a pro-active role to reinforce the
Bharatiya Janata Party agenda in Punjab
with his frequent visits. Punjab is on priority list of the BJP. Electoral ambitions
of the BJP could be just one dimension in this context.
Punjab is the state whose
religio-political discourse is different from all other states as this is a
state where a national minority is in majority and this democratic formation
has been once the ruler of this land. The other state is Jammu and Kashmir but
that that region is known for entirely different scenario at every level,
including its handling by the centre.
It is the role of the deras in the
electoral landscape of Punjab that needs to be addressed first. Is the role of
the deras in dictating political fortunes of a party is a myth or reality?
The only dera that has been known for
public intervention in the electoral process is the Dera Sacha Sauda that came
into confrontation with the Panthic stream beginning 2007 after the Assembly
election in February. This dera used to have its political wing for this
purpose. Rather this is the only dera in Punjab and Haryana that is known to
have a political wing.
This dera headquartered at Sirsa in
Haryana is perceived to have a massive following in the areas of Malwa belt of
Punjab bordering Haryana. After Sirsa, its next important branch is at
Salabatpura in Bathinda district.
The first recorded intervention of
this dera its support to the Congress in the February 2007 Assembly elections.
The Congress failed to retain power, yielding
place to Akali Dal-BJP combine.
There is yet another interesting of
Harminder Singh Jassi who was the Congress candidate from Maur in Bathinda
district in 2017 Assembly elections. Jassi happens to be brother-in-law of Dera
Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim. He trailed at third place.
But then the issue if that of
perception and this perception dangerously impacted the religio-political
discourse associated with Bargari sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib and the
related issues.
In the shifting power games, the Dera
Sacha Sauda offered to extend support to the Akali Dal in the 2009 Lok Sabha
elections. “Ram Singh, chairman of the political wing of the Dera Sacha Sauda,
threw a political bombshell by saying that the Dera Sacha Sauda was not averse
to supporting the SAD in the forthcoming parliamentary elections. Ram Singh,
who was speaking to media, said that he had toured Dera followers in Muktsar,
Bathinda, Ferozepur, Sangrur, Moga and Patiala. He added that after taking their
views, individually and in groups, he and the other seven members of the
committee formed by him, had reached the conclusion that if need arises, the
Dera would support the SAD.” (The Tribune, November 7, 2008). This has to be
seen in the context of the earlier developments including directive from Akal
Takht in May 2007 to the Sikhs to boycott this Dera at the social and political
levels after pictures appeared in the media of Gurmeet Ram Rahim attired like
10th Sikh Guru, Guru Gobind Singh within weeks of the Akali Dal-BJP
government coming to power in the state.
Several of the candidates cutting
across party lines approached the Dera for support in the 2022 Assembly
elections. The Sikh candidates among them were hauled up at Akal Takht for
violating the 2007 directive.
Another dominant Dera in Punjab is the
Beas headquartered Dera Radha Soami having its branches in several states. However,
this Dera is not known to exhibit its political proclivity.
Dera Sachkhand Ballan is the latest to
hit the headlines, although it has been in the news for more than a decade.
This Dera has its main following among the Ravidasia community. This community
is known to be better off among the Dalits who constitutes about 32 per cent of
the population in Punjab, the highest amongst all the states in the country.
The Dalits, however, are not a
monolithic vote bank, rather there is no monolithic vote bank per se in this
sensitive state although its political discourse has been dictated by the
functioning of the Sikh religio-political matrix. There are dominant but not
monolithic vote banks.
The issue is why the BJP is attaching
so much importance to this Dera. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman while
presenting the budget in Lok Sabha on February 1 referred to the 649th
anniversary of Guru Ravidas falling on that day. Modi visited Dera Ballan a few
hours later and spent a considerable time there. This importance has to be seen
in the context that it was not a centenary function of Guru Ravidass.
It may be mentioned that earlier
during the 350th anniversary commemoration of Martyrdom of Guru Tegh
Bahadur, the Ninth Sikh Guru, Modi skipped the main function at Anandpur Sahib
and rather marked his presence at the function organised by Haryana at
Kurukshetra.
These developments signal the approach
of the BJP in the context of forthcoming Assembly elections and also its
ideological push. The BJP drive is perceived to be focusing on socio-cultural
agenda rather than the religio-political. This push seems to have been framed by assigning an
important role to Nayab Singh Saini. The thinking is that Punjab, Haryana and
Himachal Pradesh are broadly part of the same socio-cultural landscape.
In this context, the approach followed
by the BJP in Haryana by moibilising all the non-landowning sections could be
replicated in Punjab. This dimension assumes all the more importance in the
context of Panthic political discourse having got fragmented, and thus
derailed. The strategy seems to be to consolidate BJP agenda among Dalits,
Hindus and OBCs. However, both Dalits and OBCs include both Sikhs and Hindus.
Ironically, although the strategy is
changing, the party is inducting Sikh leaders from other parties.
Punjab is unlike other Indian
states. Its societal core remains sensitive, its political memory long, and its
religio-political undercurrents powerful. As Punjab stands at the cusp of yet
another electoral cycle, the BJP’s expanding intervention—and the growing
prominence of deras—could shape a new chapter in the state’s evolving
political tapestry.
The covert and strategic
polarisation as being perceived to be resorted to by the BJP in this state with distinct religio-political
architecture has the potential to disturb social secularism in Punjab.

Comments
Post a Comment