Skip to main content

 



Shed arrogance, withdraw farm laws, save lives

 Ground Zero

 Jagtar Singh


India is confronted with unprecedented catastrophe.

Every life is precious.

There is also a section of the population that is fighting at two levels.

At one level is the fight for very survival and at the other is the immediate physical survival. They are the farmers, thousands of whom are camping at the gates of India’s capital demanding withdrawal of three contentious farm laws that in their perception threaten their very existence. Their apprehension is not misplaced. The underlying philosophy of these farm laws is to reduce the population of those who are dependent on agriculture as under the market mechanism, this is one of the mantras for taking the country to the higher tangent of development. This thesis is there in almost every write up by the economists who defend these laws on behalf of the Modi government.

It is, thus, wrong to say that the farmers are misguided.

It may be mentioned that for a section of the Indian leaders of that time, Shaheed Bhagat Singh, the icon of the freedom struggle, too was a misguided patriot.

Covid originated in China but that country confronted the pandemic on war footing and contained it by creating the necessary infrastructure.

In India, this pandemic was confronted with ‘Taali and Thaali’.

This is the reason that the pandemic hit back ferociously after showing signs of getting subsided during the first phase pushing the decision makers into complacency.

The situation is such that India is seeking help even from China. This is the country for the boycott of whose goods call had been given by the Sangh Parivar outfits not so long ago.

India is gasping for oxygen. Nothing can be more shocking that a city state that is Singapore has supplied oxygen containers to a big country that is India.

But then the priority of the present rulers was Mandir-Masjid narrative to which the masses became the victims, not the health-care.

Anyway.

The urgent issue is that of the withdrawal of these three farm laws.

These laws are not more crucial to the economy of the country or the bloated ego of the people ruling the country than the lives of the very people who feed the very people who constitute the Indian nation. The food grain they produce is non-communal, impervious to the mandir-masjid narrative. The people who cater to the very basic needs are fighting for their own survival as the government continues to be stubborn.

It is pertinent to repeat that these laws were forced upon the people first through ordinance and then by adopting the same in Parliament without proper debate.

This procedure defies democratic norms of discussion and debate.

Ordinance route is adopted mainly during emergency and there was no urgency to introduce these laws without consulting the stakeholders.

The farmers have decided to risk corona so that their next generation survives. This is the basic to this narrative. They would not return without restoration of the status quo ante. Many of them are old men and women.

The BJP leaders say they should return.

But then why not facilitate their return by withdrawing these laws that propagate a failed model?

Moreover, are these laws crucial to the survival of the people in India at this crucial moment?

India failed to assess this pandemic.

Why can’t it be accepted by the rulers that their assessment while thrusting these laws too might have been flawed, like in case of the pandemic? These laws are based upon flawed perception.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is the only person who cane make the critical choice in this case.

It is time to shed ego and facilitate the return of the farmers to their lands.

Dead bodies are already piling up in Shamshans and Kabristans.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio