With India pausing trade talks with Canada,
Khalistan narrative assume new dimension
Ground Zero
Jagtar Singh
The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an
independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international
relations. Pakistan is in different category.
Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks
with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from
Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant.
Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely
postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”.
Though no direct reference has been made, tension has
escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan.
Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan
for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t
choose a neighbour.
However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a
different category.
But then Indian settlers abroad being active in
affairs of their native country is nothing new.
It is pertinent to recall the formation of Ghadr Party
on the East Coast of USA with Stockton as the centre. The first settlers had
landed in Vancouver on East Coast of Canada who subsequently crossed over to
USA in the neighbourhood to form the Ghadr Party in 1912. Ghadr Party was the
first formation to raise the slogan of complete freedom, years before the
Congress adopted resolution to this effect in 1929. The Ghadr Party was mainly
Punjab centric. These activists returned to Punjab in hundreds to organize freedom
struggle. Many of them were hanged while score of others were sentenced to
Kalapani.
As such, Diaspora getting active is not new. Only the
political issue is now different.
Although first raised by the Sikh settlers in England
in 1970 and subsequently taken up by medical practitioner of Tanda Dr. Jagjit
Singh Chohan who became its poster boy for some years, the sovereign Sikh state
was demanded in Punjab by Dal Khalsa that had come up as an organization of
politically aspiring young Sikhs on August 6, 1978 in Chandigarh.
Radical Sikh leader Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale
who symbolizes the Sikh armed struggle of nineteen eighties never formally
raised this demand as he confined himself to the Anandpur Sahib Resolution of
1973 on autonomy adopted by the Shiromani Akali Dal. He was killed in army
attack on Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple) complex in June 1984.
Issue here is not the history of this demand but
reference to its origin is pertinent in the present context of this issue
having been globalized.
But then it can’t be overlooked that the militant
struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan
Singh on April 24, 1980 subsequently witnessed Operation Bluestar, code name
for unprecedented in free India army attack on Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple)
complex to flush out Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his armed associates
in June 1984. The situation only deteriorated. Khalistan demand was formally
raised by these regrouped armed activists on April 29, 1986. It is a different
issue that the 5-member Panthic Committee that raised this demand from Akal
Takht never met again.
By the time this armed struggle petered out in 1995
with last major killing being that of chief minister Beant Singh, the death
count had gone up to about more than 35,000.
Many of these people or their next of kin managed to
settle abroad.
Some of their leaders took shelter in Pakistan.
Dal Khalsa and Akali Dal (Amritsar) led by Member of
Parliament Simranjit Singh Mann have been keeping the issue alive in the
democratic domain in Indian Punjab.
Canada is not the only fertile soil for the Sikh
activists. They are carrying on their activities by way of taking out
processions and organizing rallies in USA, UK, Australia, Italy and Germany too.
However, it is Canada that is now being portrayed as
the main bad guy.
The main overseas organization active on this issue is
the USA based Sikhs for Justice led by clean-shaven Gurpatwant Singh Pannu as
its legal adviser. He is a law graduate of Panjab University, Chandigarh. It is
this body to whose activities India has been objecting to and several cases
have been registered against Pannu in India. This activity is mainly organizing
non-binding Khalistan referendum.
This activity is confined mainly to mobilizing Sikhs
in support of this demand and nothing more.
The latest such referendum was organized in Surrey in Canada.
The killing of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjer in front of a gurdwara in
this city had earlier angered the Sikhs all over.
Intriguingly, nothing is known whether India has
sought Pannu’s extradition so far or not for which USA would have to be
approached.
However, the basic issue is that of the Khalistan
narrative not phasing out despite the militant struggle having been curbed.
Canada has extended the logic that the country allows
such activities in democratic domain.
Countries like UK and Canada have constitutional
provisions for referendum. Quebec and Scotland in Canada and UK respectively
decided their destiny through referendum.
What is significant in case of Khalistan narrative is that
there is little activity in Punjab in India but the issue is alive at the
global level.
India putting pause on trade talks with India is
evidence of this narrative entering a new phase.
It is time to go into the roots to deal with the
situation with instruments of political dynamics.
AK-47 has
failed to kill the idea of Khalistan. The bullet can’t kill an idea.
Comments
Post a Comment