Skip to main content

Akal Takht Jathedar’s outburst against Centre is multi-dimensional, talks of breakup of Parliament

 


Akal Takht Jathedar’s outburst against Centre is multi-dimensional, talks of breakup of Parliament

Ground Zero

 

Jagtar Singh

Officiating Jathedar of Akal Takht, the Sikh seat symbolising synergy of religion and politics and created by Guru Hargobind as sovereign state power in the Golden Temple (Darbar Sahib), Giani Harpreet Singh, made far reaching statement relating to repercussions at the national level of the decision to split the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee to create Haryana Sikh gurdwara panel has the potential to impact radical stream in the Sikh religio-political matrix.

He said the decision to bifurcate the SGPC would boomerang on the Parliament. His ‘curse’ can be interpreted in any way. One only has to go into the dimension as to how the Parliament can break up.

He was addressing the annual gathering on March 8 at Hola Mohalla at Anandpur Sahib, the almost week long festivities in which lakhs of Sikh devotees participate.

Moderately, it can be interpreted as warning to the government at the Centre.

Giani Harpreet Singh is alumni of Punjabi University, Patiala from where he has done post-graduation in religious studies. He was also enrolled for PhD. He knows what he is speaking.

It may be mentioned that the Haryana government passed law in 2014 providing for separate gurdwara panel. The SGPC attained statutory status with the adoption of Sikh Gurdwara Act in 1925 by the Punjab legislative council. Under this act, notified gurdwaras in Punjab  were brought under control of this body. Haryana and Himachal Pradesh were then part of Punjab.

The Supreme Court recently upheld the Haryana Act following which the Haryana panel took over management of gurdwaras in that state. It is the way of taking over the control that too has been objected to by the Jathedar, the SGPC and the Akali Dal.

The Haryana panel creation at one level can be attributed to backtracking by the Shiromani Akali Dal from the demand for All-India Gurdwara Act. The SGPC at its very first general house meeting after the election in 1926 had favoured creation of such a body and the Akali Dal too raised this demand till the signing of Punjab Accord between Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and party president Harchand Singh Longowal on July 24, 1985. Three drafts were prepared for this legislation before this issue was dumped by the Akali Dal. The SGPC general house way back in 1970 had warned against such design when chief minister in Haryana was Bansi Lal.

The Jathedar should have gone into this aspect too.

Moreover, why should the Sikhs in Haryana be denied to manage their shrines autonomously?

Giani Harpreet Singh did not spare even the Akali Dal but at a different level by pointing out as to its take over by the money-bags from its being a party of farmers and working classes.

He stopped short at that and did not spell out the framework for the revival of the party that has been witnessing steep downfall since the 2017 Assembly polls.

A section of the senior leaders has been demanding change in leadership at the top but such leaders had to quit. The last senior leader to come out of the Shiromani Akali Dal is former SGPC chief and its first woman president Bibi Jagir Kaur.

Her single point agenda is now to mobilise, galvanise and revive the moderate Akali stream in the religio-political matrix.

The problem with the Akali Dal is that Punjab has been witnessing several agitations, some directly in the Sikh religio-political domain but this party remains isolated and alienated. The party leadership controlling the affairs lacks even the Panthic idiom, what to talk of reverting to the traditional support base.

The main hurdle in the revival of Akali Dal is Bargari sacrilege narrative. The role of Akal Takht and the SGPC too has been questionable in this narrative. The Jathedar should make the beginning by opting for introspection with follow up action. He should visit both Burj and Bargari villages as part of the rectification process and then proceed with steps for revival of Sikh institutions.

 

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio