Akal
Takht Jathedar’s outburst against Centre is multi-dimensional, talks of breakup
of Parliament
Ground Zero
Jagtar Singh
Officiating Jathedar
of Akal Takht, the Sikh seat symbolising synergy of religion and politics and
created by Guru Hargobind as sovereign state power in the Golden Temple (Darbar
Sahib), Giani Harpreet Singh, made far reaching statement relating to
repercussions at the national level of the decision to split the Shiromani
Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee to create Haryana Sikh gurdwara panel has the
potential to impact radical stream in the Sikh religio-political matrix.
He said the
decision to bifurcate the SGPC would boomerang on the Parliament. His ‘curse’
can be interpreted in any way. One only has to go into the dimension as to how
the Parliament can break up.
He was
addressing the annual gathering on March 8 at Hola Mohalla at Anandpur Sahib,
the almost week long festivities in which lakhs of Sikh devotees participate.
Moderately,
it can be interpreted as warning to the government at the Centre.
Giani
Harpreet Singh is alumni of Punjabi University, Patiala from where he has done
post-graduation in religious studies. He was also enrolled for PhD. He knows what
he is speaking.
It may be
mentioned that the Haryana government passed law in 2014 providing for separate
gurdwara panel. The SGPC attained statutory status with the adoption of Sikh
Gurdwara Act in 1925 by the Punjab legislative council. Under this act,
notified gurdwaras in Punjab were
brought under control of this body. Haryana and Himachal Pradesh were then part
of Punjab.
The Supreme
Court recently upheld the Haryana Act following which the Haryana panel took
over management of gurdwaras in that state. It is the way of taking over the
control that too has been objected to by the Jathedar, the SGPC and the Akali
Dal.
The Haryana
panel creation at one level can be attributed to backtracking by the Shiromani Akali
Dal from the demand for All-India Gurdwara Act. The SGPC at its very first
general house meeting after the election in 1926 had favoured creation of such
a body and the Akali Dal too raised this demand till the signing of Punjab
Accord between Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and party president Harchand Singh
Longowal on July 24, 1985. Three drafts were prepared for this legislation
before this issue was dumped by the Akali Dal. The SGPC general house way back
in 1970 had warned against such design when chief minister in Haryana was Bansi
Lal.
The Jathedar
should have gone into this aspect too.
Moreover,
why should the Sikhs in Haryana be denied to manage their shrines autonomously?
Giani
Harpreet Singh did not spare even the Akali Dal but at a different level by
pointing out as to its take over by the money-bags from its being a party of
farmers and working classes.
He stopped
short at that and did not spell out the framework for the revival of the party
that has been witnessing steep downfall since the 2017 Assembly polls.
A section of
the senior leaders has been demanding change in leadership at the top but such leaders
had to quit. The last senior leader to come out of the Shiromani Akali Dal is
former SGPC chief and its first woman president Bibi Jagir Kaur.
Her single
point agenda is now to mobilise, galvanise and revive the moderate Akali stream
in the religio-political matrix.
The problem
with the Akali Dal is that Punjab has been witnessing several agitations, some
directly in the Sikh religio-political domain but this party remains isolated
and alienated. The party leadership controlling the affairs lacks even the
Panthic idiom, what to talk of reverting to the traditional support base.
The main hurdle
in the revival of Akali Dal is Bargari sacrilege narrative. The role of Akal
Takht and the SGPC too has been questionable in this narrative. The Jathedar
should make the beginning by opting for introspection with follow up action. He
should visit both Burj and Bargari villages as part of the rectification
process and then proceed with steps for revival of Sikh institutions.
Comments
Post a Comment