Skip to main content

Punjab CM Mann should come out with logic behind his demand for separate Assembly that is legacy rooted issue

 


AAP should explain logic behind demand for separate Punjab Assembly in Chandigarh

 

Ground Zero

Jagtar Singh

 

Punjab Assembly. High Court of Punjab. Punjab Civil Secretariat.

These were the names of the three building complexes comprising the Capitol Complex in the Punjab’s capital Chandigarh till November 1, 1966.

Haryana came to be added to these three names on November 1, 1966.

Both Punjab Civil Secretariat and Punjab Assembly complexes were divided to accommodate Haryana as the ownership of these buildings was transferred to newly created Union Territory of Chandigarh, the capital of Punjab till then.

The high court continues to be the common link between Punjab and Haryana as the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.

Chandigarh was founded as the capital of Punjab after partition in 1947 as this was the only region that had suffered the loss of its capital during partition of India in 1947 as Lahore went to newly created Pakistan. In this context, the original ownership of the Capitol Complex is with Punjab as Haryana was supposed to move out to a new capital as has been the practice since the reorganisation of states after 1947.

Haryana has thus rightly demanded a separate Assembly and a separate high court.

Punjab as such is not supposed to reciprocate Haryana make similar demands.

No chief minister, not just in Punjab or Haryana but in the entire country, can be considered by be politically naïve.

However, Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann yesterday reacted to the demand from Haryana for allocation of land in Chandigarh for its separate Assembly complex. This issue was raised by Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal Khattar at a meeting of  at North Zonal Council. Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who chaired, responded positively. Reaction from Mann, who had deputed his minister to represent Punjab, followed by echoing the same demand. There must be the reason for it.

Earlier, he had demanded separate Punjab high court and this was revealed by his Haryana counterpart as reported by The Hindu in a news datelined April 30: “Haryana Chief Minister Manohar Lal on Saturday said Haryana and Punjab have demanded the setting up of separate High Courts for both them and regarding this, both would duly send their proposals to the Union Home Ministry. In New Delhi, interacting with the journalists after attending the joint conference of Chief Ministers and the Chief Justices of High Courts, organised by the Ministry of Law and Justice, Mr. Lal stated that the demand for setting up a separate High Court for Haryana was made in the joint conference. “Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann also demanded the setting up of a separate High Court for Punjab.”- The Hindu”.

The status of Chandigarh is one of those highly sensitive but dormant issue associated with Punjab political domain that, if stirred, has the potential to explode in the face.

The transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab and  end to exploitation of river water resources of the state have been two of the most sensitive issues over the decades in this volatile border state on which the Shiromani Akali Dal launched the last agitation on August 4, 1982 known as the “Dharamyudh Morcha” that finally provided political space to radical politics symbolised by Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale. The controversial Satluj Yamuna Canal is part of this river waters narrative whose construction was stopped following gunning down of its senior most engineers by Balwinder Singh Jatana and his associates from Babbar Khalsa in 1990. Sidhu Moosewala’s posthumous song ‘SYL’ banned by the centre resurrected Jatana.

The issue here is that of political perception of AAP so far as the sensitive legacy matters relating to Punjab are concerned.

No chief minister or for that matter any political party in this state can afford to abandon claim over Chandigarh or river waters. No party in this state can oppose the demand for political autonomy.

No AAP leader has so far further elaborated upon the demand for land in Chandigarh for new Punjab Assembly complex. The Punjab Assembly complex is already there!

Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann should have rather welcomed the demand made by his Haryana counterpart with the suggestion that the new state Assembly complex should be constructed by the neighbouring state at a place easily accessible to the people, or in adjoining Panchkula.

Punjab should have opposed allocation of land to Haryana in Chandigarh for this purpose.

Punjab should have also welcomed Haryana demanding its independent high court rather than making similar demand.

AAP narrative counters the legacy narrative associated with Punjab and this domain is highly sensitive. Sangrur result in Lok Sabha by-election is a lesson for AAP.

AAP should now come with rationale for Mann making such demands that are perceived as anti-Punjab.

Punjab’s religio-political domain is not only different from all other states and regions in India but also too sensitive to be played with.

Arvind Kejriwal as the AAP chief should make his party stand clear on these issues.

People of Punjab had brought AAP with unprecedented mandate by rejecting the Congress and dumping the Shiromani Akali Dal.

These people have the right to understand the thinking of AAP behind these demands that change the entire legacy narrative.

By the way, Punjab Assembly complex has a roof-top open air theatre too.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Damage to institution of Akal Takht symbolising Sikh sovereignty more important dimension of current crisis in Sikh domain

  Ideological Damage to Akal Takht most important dimension of Akali Crisis Ground Zero By Jagtar Singh The Sikh religio-political discourse entered a new phase on Baisakhi 2025 — the historic day on which Guru Gobind Singh, in 1699, created the Khalsa at Anandpur Sahib, completing the ideological foundation laid by Guru Nanak Dev, the founder of the Sikh faith. Significant developments emerged from the well-attended Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) conference held at Takht Sri Damdama Sahib on April 13. It was the first major public appearance of Sukhbir Singh Badal since his re-election as party president on April 12, marking his return to the helm after a brief interregnum. Sukhbir, who first succeeded his father, Parkash Singh Badal, as party president in 2008, resumes leadership of a party long dominated by the Badal family—an influence that has spanned over three decades, the longest in the SAD’s history. For months, the religio-political landscape of Punjab has remained i...

Akal Takht intervenes to reset Sikh religio-political discourse

  Akal Takht intervenes to reset Sikh religio-political discourse Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh, Dec 8: The Sikh religio-political domain has the tendency to dictate religio-political discourse of Punjab whose polity is different from other regions in the country. This is the state where a national dynamic minority is in majority. This minority was the third entity in all the political negotiations leading to India’s independence. What happened in Punjab on December 2 has to be reviewed in this backdrop as this development is going to have far-reaching impact not only on the future of the Shiromani Akali Dal but also the political tendencies at several levels. It is pertinent to mention at this stage itself that the Sikh religio-political discourse is presently affecting even India’s geo-politics, especially in the American sub-continent in the context of the activities of a section of the Sikh Diaspora. December 2 was unprecedented in the history of more than a c...

Killing of Sidhu Moosewala is chilling reminder that all is not well with Punjab but not the time to indulge in blame game

  Something continues to be wrong with Punjab going by killing of Sidhu Moosewala Ground Zero Jagtar Singh   The killing of  Punjabi pop star Shubhdeep Singh Sidhu popular as Sidhu Moosewala is more than shocking. It has not only numbed Punjab but has triggered shock waves across the seas. The only inference that can be drawn from this tragic end of a young icon is that something is not right with Punjab, despite illusion created by degenerated political elite of so called normalcy. It is the system that has to return to normalcy. It has not. The unabated degeneration in the system at times tend to play havoc. This is not the time to play blame game. Rather this is the time to rise above parochial political interests. Punjab needs consensus to facilitate the return of this historically disturbed state and the injured psyche to return to normalcy. And it is not an easy task. What Punjab lacks at this juncture is a role model. After all, Punjab is not a state like any other...