NEW leadership of the SGPC marks a departure from post-Tohra phase, could be more acceptable to different streaks
Tohra
associates chosen to lead SGPC signals qualitative shift towards Panthic domain
Ground Zero
Jagtar Singh
The annual
election of the office bearers of the statutory Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak
Committee this time has been characterised by a qualitative shift in the
Panthic matrix.
This perhaps
is the first time that the central leadership of the Akali Dal controlling this
body has not attracted any criticism after a long time.
Constituted
under the Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925, the SGPC manages the sanctified Sikh
historical shrines in Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, and Chandigarh. The office
bearers of this body of its only kind in the world to manage religious
institutions are elected annually at the general body meeting barring the first
set of office bearers after the general election who have a term of two years.
Like in any
parliamentary system, it is the party that gets the majority that reserves the
right to elect office bearers and as such, there is nothing wrong in the system per se. It is the majority party
in the Assembly that finalises the name of the chief minister or the prime
minister in the parliamentary system. No other political formation has
succeeded in challenging the supremacy of the Shiromani Akali Dal in this
domain over years.
However, the
office bearers are expected to function independently.
Going by the
history of this more than 100 years old body set up on November 15, 1920, the
SGPC has played a very active role in religio-political affairs of the Sikhs including
that of demanding the Sikh State and opposing the Pakistan demand of the Muslim
League. The political interventions of the SGPC got diluted in the recent past.
Both Harjinder
Singh Dhami and Karnail Singh Panjoli who have been elected as the president and the general
secretary respectively belong to those who were tempered by Akali stalwart
Jathedar Gurcharan Singh Tohra who lorded over the SGPC for more than quarter
of a century and represented the Panthic streak in the Sikh religio-political
domain. His ideological contribution is unmatched during that period. He represented
politics of commitment to the Panth and practiced the same.
He was the
bridge among different ideological formations in the Sikh religio-political
matrix but did not allow discernible intervention from the party in the
functioning of this body.
It is
because of this reason that the election of Dhami and Panjoli is significant
and that too amidst continuing attack on Shiromani Akali Dal leadership of having
damaged the Sikh institutions. Both the SGPC and the Akal Takht had come under
strong criticism during the narrative relating to the sacrilege of Guru Granth
Sahib at Bargari in 2015. Punjab was under the rule of Akali Dal at that time.
The choice
of the present office bearers can be attributed to the move to restore the credibility
of these two institutions with the perception of these two leaders representing
the Panthic values.
Not that
outgoing president Bibi Jagir Kaur did not belong to the Panthic domain but somehow,
her perception was not of a leader active more in Panthic domain as she could
easily move about in both Panthic as well as political domains like Tohra.
However, Tohra never contested the Assembly election. He did contest the Lok
Sabha election in 1977 when the party fielded all the senior leaders in view of
the importance of that election at the national level to defeat Indira Gandhi after
the Emergency.
The Shiromani
Akali Dal carries the baggage of Bargari and the investigation relating to
these cases is still to move towards the logical conclusion.
The SGPC is
the bridge between the Sikh masses and the Akali Dal.
A strong SGPC with credible leadership can go a
long way in supplementing the Akali Dal.
Now is the
time to make a new beginning.
Comments
Post a Comment