Skip to main content

Withdraw sedition cases against agitating farmers, they are not anti-national

 


Sedition case against protesting farmers in Haryana is desecration of democracy

Ground Zero

Jagtar Singh



 

Sedition law is legacy of the colonial rule that was introduced by the British to crush democratic aspirations and struggle for freedom of the people living in this region.

The British rulers left the partitioned Indian sub-continent in 1947 but the new rulers- our own- have continued with that draconian law that should have no place in a modern  and world’s biggest democracy going by the size of population.

The problem is that those entrusted with running the affairs of the country at every level rather than being the public servants continue to behave as the rulers and by implication, those being ruled over are subjects, not equal citizens.

This amounts to desecration of democracy.

Such is the attitude of the rulers is that even ordinary protest is charged under sedition at times.

As per the report in The Indian Express of July 14,  the Sirsa police have registered FIR against 100-150 farmer protesters under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code including Section 124 A (Sedition).

The Crime?

They were protesting on Sunday against  Deputy Speaker Ranbir Gangwa.

It may be mentioned that the agitating farmers are not allowing the ruling BJP and JJP leaders to hold functions or enter villages in Haryana.

In Punjab, a campaign has been launched by the farmers against entry of political leaders of every party in the villages.

The farmers have been protesting against the three farm laws thrust on them by the Modi government last year. Thousands of farmers have been camping at three places on the outskirts of Delhi blocking three national highways since November 26 last.

The protest is unprecedented and has attracted global attention.

The protest is no more just for scrapping the three laws that are perceived to spell doom for the farmers by introducing corporate farming, but has the potential to dictate the development model at the global level. The market model of development is anti-people and resulted in widening disparities.

The farmer struggle is being commanded by the farmers of Punjab and Haryana, agriculturally the two most advanced states, who are going to be the most adversely hit.

The issue here, however, is the law of sedition.

Even the framers of this draconian law did not use it so brazenly as the  native rulers.

How come that the protest by the farmers be sedition? Even if one concedes that there might have been some stray cases of violence, the same would have been dealt with under the criminal law.

The problem is there is no difference between one party or the other when in power so far as the application of sedition law is concerned.

Such is the attitude of the rulers that this law  has been applied even against the students voicing their concerns in the educational institutions.

The irony is that even more than seven decades after India attained freedom, this country continues to be colonial democracy not just by way of retention of laws like sedition but also the style of governance.

The problem is that every ruling party has tried to introduce more and more anti-people and draconian laws under the garb of confronting what is called terrorism. Punjab has been witnessing killings by the police in fake  encounters since 1970.

The people at large are just indifferent to this style of governance. The people in the Indian subcontinent have been ruled upon by others over centuries and this has impacted the attitude.

Of course, there always have been voices of dissent and revolt.

One must read the commentary of Bhagat Singh (Shaheed) after six Babbar activists were hanged in Lahore jail to grasp the mentality of the people. There is little change over the years.

Can the scrapping of the laws like sedition and UAPA become the agenda in 2024 Lok Sabha election?

Time to turn India’s democracy pro-people.

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio