Skip to main content

Modi could be as misleading on farm laws as logic of demonitisation as anti-terrorism weapon

 



Modi could be as misleading on farm laws as  logic of demonitisation  as anti-terrorism weapon

 

Jagtar Singh

Ground Zero

In the latest such shocking incident, at least twenty-two security personnel were killed in a bloody confrontation with the Naxalites in Chhatisgarh. The number of casualties on the other side are stated to be twelve, including a woman.

This perhaps is the case of the highest number of the security personnel killed since the Pulwama bomb attack on the convey in Jammu and Kashmir that changed the narrative in the run up to the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.

One of the differences now is that the Pakistan factor is missing in Chhatisgarh. Of course, the Assembly elections are being held in several states.

The Chhatisgarh incident cannot in any way be linked to the struggle for existence by the farmers that has spread across several states after having been triggered in Punjab that historically is a turbulent zone. But then the two narratives are linked at entirely a different level. It is a different matter that the militancy in India’s tribal belt too is closely linked to preservation of the way of life.

One has to recall the shocker that was delivered by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the late evening of November 8, 2016 that was the demonitisation. That action wrecked the economy. The jolt to the economy by Covid might not have been so severe in case demonitisation had not hit the economy earlier. India is the country whose economy suffered such double shocker.

Modi and his ministers have been going about arguing in favour of the three farm laws saying these were for the welfare of the farmers. The Modi government continues to maintain that the farmers have been misled. India has not witnessed such a massive and peaceful struggle since the partition in 1947.

Modi might be as wrong in case of the farmers as his arguments fell flat in favour of demonitisation.

The farm laws have been adopted during Covid and without discussion. The government first promulgated ordinance, the route that is resorted to only in case of emergency. There was no such emergency in this case. These ordinances were later ratified in Parliament through method that has raised several questions.

Modi announced on November 8, 2016 that demonitisation was the weapon to confront corruption, black money, fake notes and terrorism.

The Chhatisgarh tragedy has happened after nearly five years after demonitisation that was to counter terrorism.

India continues to confront militancy.

Corruption continues to be as rampant as earlier.

The arguments for demonitisation have fallen flat and this exactly what is important so far the defence of the farm laws  by the government goes.

It is the divisive politics that sustains the BJP in elections, not the performance.

The farm struggle, however, is purely a socio-economic issue that might hit the basic structure of the rural society.

The pro-government economists have repeatedly written that the number of farmers depending on this sector has to be reduced for higher growth of the GDP. This is the logic of the laws rooted in market forces.

The Modi government has opted for the confrontational path to deal with the farm struggle with the suspension of the dialogue.

The latest attack is the decision to make direct payment to the farmers for procured crops. There should be no middleman but these laws would replace one set of middlemen with the corporate middlemen who would dictate terms with the consumers too.

The basic issue here is the fallacy of advocacy of demonitisation earlier by Modi and the same line of assertion in case of the farm laws.

Like the demonitisation, the farm laws too would hit the economy.

After Pulwama, the Chhatisgarh attack is another example of failure of demonitisation to contain terrorism and that exactly is the issue.

The Modi government must withdraw these laws at the earliest and chalk out the reform agenda in consultation with the stakeholders, in this case the farmers.

 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act
Post a Comment
Read more

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik
Post a Comment
Read more

Lok Sabha elections in Punjab fail to even touch state’s socio-economic contradictions, what to talk of solutions

  Lok Sabha elections in Punjab fail to even touch state’s socio-economic contradictions Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: Move over traditional dhabas. KFCs, Macdonalds, Subways, Café Coffee Day, Tim Horton and the like now dot Punjab’s countryside along the highways. Modern integrated food complexes have come up and more are coming up that maintain what can be called as international standard, including that of cleanliness. A family of three, including one man and two women with one wearing a symbolic Gatra, entered one such complex as it was opening in the morning near Jagraon in the Malwa hinterland. The confident rural women had their choice of filling of the Subway burger. Apparently, they were used to the new food habits. Not a case in isolation. Havelis still serve traditional food. This write-up is not about the changing consumption pattern. This is one side of Punjab, especially   of the countryside   and semi-urban variety that has adopted to the latest.
Post a Comment
Read more