Skip to main content

Nails at Tikri: Normandy fortifications had failed Hitler

 


Nails at Tikri: Normandy fortifications had failed Hitler

Jagtar Singh

Ground Zero

Operation Overlord was launched by the Allied forces against Germany at fifteen minutes past midnight on June 6, 1944. That was the turning point in World War II.

Hitler had never dreamt that the highly fortified beaches of Normandy would be the main theatre of attack in the Western sector. The Red army had already started the main push from the East.

The highly fortified iron and concrete defences on the beaches of Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno and Sword on the French coast started falling under combined sea and air offensive from the Allied forces. This was the beginning of the fall of Hitler.


Germany after overrunning neighbouring countries undertook in 1942 to 1944 an extensive programme to construct coastal defence system as Allied offensive was expected from the sea. Hitler opted for what he called ‘Atlantikwall’ stretchinGermany g for over 4000 kilometres having bunkers, pillboxes and other such systems.

There is a reason that the strategies and tactics of World War II have been recalled.

Hashtag #FencingLikeChinaPak has been trending on Twitter since Tuesday morning focussing on the unprecedented fortification of Delhi.

The fortifications at Tikri, the border between Delhi and one of the entry points from Haryana from Rohtak side, have striking parallels with Hitler’s Atlantic Wall of which the Normandy defence was the part.

India is the largest functional democracy in the world, though not participatory but colonial. During no protest since 1947 when this land was partitioned that such tactics have been resorted to by any government against a mass struggle by the people on the issue that is not political but viewed as issue of their very survival. This is the struggle by the farmers for the scrapping of the three farm laws that they fear to be threat to their very existence. One of these laws would also facilitate monopoly by private sector – read corporates – on food grains that would affect the consumers too. At that level, the farmers are battling for every section of society in the country and not just their own survival.

But for some aberration on January 26 during Tractor Parade, this agitation has been  an example of peaceful mass struggle.

The fence constructed at Tikri gives the impression that it is some international border. The design seems to be to make Delhi ‘Tractor Proof’. But then a tractor is not a tank but a farming machine. Farmers in France bring their tractors to Paris when staging protests.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is no Hitler and he heads the biggest democracy in the world. The power to bring about a change wrests with the people. And the farmers are not some armed organisation planning coup. Their only weapon is the vote.

The popular struggles can’t be confronted by hiding behind fortifications. It may be mentioned that already, the ruling elite in India has created the façade of security threat and members of this class move around protected by posse of security people at the cost of the taxpayers. These defences are also coming at the cost of the taxpayers.

And this strategy has been put in place against the very people who feed this nation.

Going by the data quoted by the farm economists, the farm sector progressed over the years but it resulted in pauperisation of peasantry. The push factor has been operational for years and this factor would be accentuated under the new farm laws.

India needs pragmatic farm policy and not these laws that would hand over the farm sector to the corporates. This is the sector whose output is not impacted by any pandemic or war and hence is eyed by the corporate sharks.

The people know as to what is good for them. The farmers know these laws are bad for them.

The government is yet to come out with the answer as to why paddy from Bihar is brought to Punjab for sale and why the farmers in that state come to Punjab as farm labourers despite that state having introduced similar ‘reforms’ in 2006.

The nails at Tikri would bleed democracy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio