Modi government should avoid testing stamina of agitating farmers as the issue is of threat to the very existence
Government should offer suspension of 3 farm laws to break deadlock with protesting farmers
Jagtar Singh
Ground Zero
The Narendra Modi government today again invited the
protesting farmers within the previous framework and the same has
understandably been rightly rejected by them. The logjam continues despite even
the track II talks at several levels involving serving and retired bureaucrats
and police officials from Punjab. The agitation against the three contentious pro-corporate
farm laws is being commandeered by Punjab farmers who were the first to
comprehend their likely disastrous impact rooted in liberalisation policies being
dictated by the World Trade Organisation to which India is a signatory.
Prime Minister Modi has been repeatedly propagating ‘benefits’
of these farm laws which, according to him, the agitating farmers have failed
to understand as they are being misled by vested political interests, meaning
the Congress. The farmers organisations, on the other hand, have maintained respectable
distance from various political parties.
While the government continues to parrot the offer of
amendments that had also been made by Home Minister Amit Shah (to amend even 99
per cent as per the farmer leaders present in the meeting) while the other side
refuses to budge from the demand of dropping of the three laws.
There has to be some mid-point to break the deadlock, the
initiative for which has to come from the Modi government.
The Supreme Court on December 16 had proposed a way out but
that was half-a-step while hinting at the other part of the step. The
livelaw.in uploaded a quote from the Bench that states, “The bench directed the
SGI to form a committee comprising of the members of Government and Members of
all Farmers Association of India to engage in talks and come to an amicable
solution”. The Bench had also sought opinion of the government on ‘keeping in
law in abeyance’.
This suggestion needs to be given the shape of offer in
concrete by taking another step.
The Modi government should offer suspension of the three
farm laws at least for two years along with the setting up of a committee
including representatives of the unions leading the protest to formulate
comprehensive farm policy. These three contentious farm laws relate to mainly
the trade dimension of the farm sector and are perceived to be a step towards facilitating
monopoly control of the corporates on farm sector that is source of livelihood
and employment for about half of the population in India.
The talks should start from the offer of suspension and the
outcome would depend upon the negotiators. The negotiators from the government
side should have the power to take decision and should not be just confined to
the role of the post office as is the case with the present official team.
The people who are directly part of the decision making
exercise and those who are lobbyists continue to portray this agitation as being led by the big farmers of Punjab. Such
type of thinking can only be pitied upon. Going by the official record, 86 per
of the farmers in Punjab are small and marginal. Despite 70 per cent of the
water from Punjab rivers flowing out to neighbouring Haryana and Rajasthan,
more than 99 per cent of the area under cultivation is irrigated. The productivity
of wheat and paddy in Punjab is perhaps
the highest. And above all, the state
offers marketing infrastructure that is the best in the country. The incidence
of farm debt is also the highest, so is the case of mechanisation. Farmers even
with one acre of land have tractors.
The thinking of decision makers and lobbyists in this
government is flawed, or it has been made flawed by some other forces.
These people need to visit Singhu or Tikri border, if not
some remote village in the interior of Punjab that otherwise is a small state
now to know the grassroot reality which would help them to carry out course
correction.
The beginning needs to be made by the government by offering
suspension of the laws for two years to end the deadlock rather than repeating
the same amendments.
Sooner the Modi government realises that it is not some
ordinary agitation, the better it would be.
The dynamics of Punjab functions between two extremes.
Good analysis worth sharing
ReplyDelete