Should not Z plus security cover of Sumedh Saini, former Punjab DGP, be revoked as he has voluntarily left it and gone underground?
Can a person with Z plus security cover, Sumedh Saini in
this case, go underground?
Ground Zero
Former Punjab Director General of Police Sumedh Singh Saini,
a Z plus protectee, having absconded raises some fundamental
questions.
He was denied anticipatory bail by the district court in
Mohali after Section 302 was added to the case registered against him relating
to the detention, torture and disappearance of Chandigarh employee Balwant
Singh Multani in 1991 who happened to be son of a serving IAS officer in
Punjab. A Punjab cadre IPS officer, Saini was then on deputation with the
Chandigarh administration.
His bail plea in the Punjab and Haryana High Court could not
be heard as the judge concerned reclused himself. This is not the only case
Saini is facing.
He was appointed as
the state police chief during the Akali Dal government headed by Parkash Singh
Badal. The name of Saini surfaces among those
in Punjab associated with the human rights violations during militancy. The disappearance
of Multani is one such case.
The very first question is as to how come that the state has
no information about the person who is under its special protection having been
provided Z plus security cover under which the person is also under which the
security umbrella also includes a car with a jammer to neutralise wireless
triggered bomb attack. This vehicle is
besides the other escort vehicles. A person facing such high risk suddenly
going off the radar of the security agencies betrays the failure of these
agencies.
The second dimension is that if the person concerned has
been moving around for the last several days without his special protection, that
means that person just does not need this security cover. Why should the tax
payers be burdened with the security of such people? His security cover should be
withdrawn on this very basis.
The third important aspect is as to who is sheltering him. Would
action would also be taken against the people with whom he is staying?
Or is it possible that such person is being protected by
some other agency? After all, Saini is
among those officers who were considered to be ‘heroes’ in the fight against
militancy in Punjab. These people were protecting the Indian State.
Several of these officers were rewarded by the Badal
government despite the promise in the Akali Dal manifesto at one time to take
action against those guilty of human rights excesses.
However, the basic issue at present is that of Saini having
gone undergone to evade arrest.
This is one case in which some powerful people at the top
are learnt to be taking keen interest. Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh is also
under political pressure from his cabinet colleagues to take action. Saini was the
police chief during sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib at Bargari and the police
firing on peaceful Sikh protesters at Kotkapura followed by Behbal Kalan in
2015. Every effort has been made to scuttle that probe.
The Multani case is with the Punjab police unlike the
Bargari case in which CBI was also involved before the Punjab government
decided to withdraw it from the central agency.
Should not the Punjab government announce the withdrawal of
his security cover as he has left it behind at his own?
Every life is
precious. So was that of Balwant Singh Multani.
The Punjab government should now start the exercise of
pruning such security.
Why should some lives in democracy be more precious than that
of others?
The main issue at present in this case, however, is as to
how can the security agencies be in the dark about a person who is on the high priority
list for protection?
Comments
Post a Comment