Khalistan discourse stages comeback on Bluestar anniversary,
this time via Akal Takht Jathedar
Thirty six years after Operation Bluestar, the demand for
Khalistan has staged a comeback, this time via Akal Takht acting Jathedar Giani
Harpreet Singh. Today was the anniversary of that unprecedented army action in
independent India. The demand for Khalistan had not been raised by any main
politicio-militant formation till 6 June, 1984.
The issue cropped up in reply to a question at the press
conference after the anniversary function was over at the Akal Takht that is
organised by the Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee.
He started with the remark of every government at the centre
being anti-Sikh.
The issue of Khalistan came up in reply to a question about
the raising of Khalistan slogans after the function was over. He justified
raising the slogans thereby providing legitimacy under the present situation.
When asked about his stand on the demand itself, he said, “In
case it is given, we will take it. Every Sikh in the world in his heart longs
for it”.
He also called upon the people to keep the memory of Sant
Bhindranwale and his associates alive who were killed during the army attack.
It may be mentioned that martyrs memorial in the Golden
Temple complex in the name of Sant Bhindranwale perpetuates the memory of that
brutal tragedy that changed the discourse of Punjab. At the same time, it
provides legitimacy to that struggle.
What is important in the present context that it is for the
first time that Akal Takht Jathedar has talked about Khalistan.
Sitting alongside was
Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee president Gobind Singh Longowal who also
agreed to what the Akal Takht Jathedar had stated. The SGPC is dominated by
Shiromani Akali Dal headed by Sukhbir Singh Badal.
It is pertinent to compare his comments with Sant
Bhindranwale who otherwise never raised this demand formally.
Here is from his speech of 27 March 1983:
“The Punjab Chief Minister says he is very wise and
intelligent. The issue of ‘Sikhs as a separate nation’ is being talked about; I
was not here when the resolution was passed and the details are known to the
leaders. The newspapers raised hue and cry. Every effort was made to
communalise the issue at the global level. (It was said) Sikhs want separation;
I stayed in Delhi for ten days where this question was asked to me repeatedly;
the journalists coming from outside question me daily on it. They ask me
whether I want Khalistan or not..
I say, “I neither oppose it nor so far support it. I am silent.
Yes, it is definite that if this time it is offered by the Indian rulers (The
world used was Hindustan Di Ranee), we would positively take it; would not
reject the offer; we would not repeat the blunder of 1947. But we so far don’t
demand it”.
Indira Gandhi should tell us, “Whether we are to be kept
within India or not. We want to remain in India, she should tell whether she
wants to keep us or not”.
He thus threw the ball in the court of Indira Gandhi but
never committed himself directly to the demand. All along, he had pressed for
the acceptance of the demand for state autonomy on the basis of Anandpur Sahib
on which the struggle had been launched by the Akali Dal on 4 August, 1982 and
not Sant Bhindranwale.
He never directly raised this demand in any of his speech till his death.
Giani Harpreet Singh’s comment on Khalistan at the news conference
has to be seen in continuity with his earlier speech at Akal Takht at the
conclusion of the Bluestar anniversary function. He talked about the objective
of that struggle that led to Bluestar.
He said this was the time for the Sikhs to join their heads
and deliberate upon the objective for which “our fighters” (Saade jarnail) sacrificed
their lives. He stressed on “right intentions and strategy” to achieve those
aims. He called upon the Sikhs to rise above parochial considerations and unite
as that was the demand of the situation.
His comment on Khalistan was continuation of this very
thought process that he had articulated. The martyrs memorial in the Darbar
Sahib (Golden Temple) not only commemorate the struggle but also provides it
the legitimacy.
Comments
Post a Comment