Skip to main content

Akal Takht Jathedar should initiate move for restoring credibility and status of Sikh institutions


Akal Takht Jathedar should initiate move for restoring credibility and status of Sikh institutions

Within hours of the Akal Takht acting Jathedar Giani Harpreet Singh creating ripple during Operation Bluestar anniversary function by reviving the issue of Sikh homeland, Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee president Gobind Singh Longowal went on record seeking permission of the government to serve Parsad and Langar in Sikh shrines. These are the two extremes in the religio-political dynamics. Seeking permission from the government to serve even Parsad and Langar reflects yet another level of the degradation of the highest Sikh institutions. The Sikhs shrines don’t function within any government outlined framework.

This statement of Longowal, however, is not the provocation for this write-up. It is just another example.

This is mainly in the context of Operation Bluestar narrative of GIani Harpreet Singh.

The problem is that the highest Sikh institutions like Akal Takht and the SGPC have lost their credibility during the last two decades and have started stinking.

It may be added here is that at one level, the Shiromani Akali Dal too is part of the Sikh institutions going by its genesis and not just a power hungry political party to which it stands reduced to.

The restoration of credibility involves certain process that also includes retrospection and review  without which concrete steps can’t be taken for revival. Both the Akal Takht and the SGPC has been representative of the Sikh aspirations from time to time. The SGPC elected under this very Sikh Gurdwara Act has been playing crucial role in dictating the Sikh religio-political discourse for years.

Depth in this case has no measure and as such, one can’t say the functioning of these institutions has hit rock bottom.

The Akal Takht Jathedar should unleash steps to evolve institutional framework for the autonomous functioning of these institutions. The framework is now all the more needed in view of these institutions having been tuned to serve the political interests of the dominant leadership. Just change in leadership is not the remedy, such is the degradation.

It is because of the lack of credibility that certain Sikh sections have questioned the legitimacy of Giani Harpreet Singh in going back to the issue of the Sikh state while justifying the raising of Khalistan Zindabad slogans. Despite the earlier Supreme Court ruling, such slogans are now inviting action from the state under colonial sedition laws.

The Akal Takht over the years has been reduced to yet another gurdwara where Guru Granth Sahib has been installed at more than one place and long Golaks (Cash boxes) placed in front creating barrier between the devotee and the Guru. This was not the functioning of this institution earlier that symbolises Sikh state power. There was no need  for Guru Hargobind to set up a gurdwara in front of the Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple).

Broader consensus needs to be evolved on this sensitive issue by involving the Sikh institutions and organisations functioning at the global level. The working of many of these institutions and bodies has been taken over un-Sikh practices. This includes several prominent ones. This process could be a long haul.

The events of 2015 are a pointer to the level of exploitation of the Sikh institutions by the top political players of the time. This institution needs to be insulated from such players who might change from time to time.

Similar is the situation with the SGPC. This institution was corrupted beginning 1999 as part of the design, the degeneration in its functioning being a different issue. It may be mentioned that the design of the state during the pre-Operation Bluestar was to get this institution dissolved and replace it with a board. With its present level of rot, there is no need for that. Introducing reform is a must. This institution needs more than reforms in its functioning. The pressure has to be built from the grassroots.

 

 

 

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio