The above picture is of the ISIS –Khurasan terrorist who, the organisation
claimed, carried out the attack on the Sikhs in the gurdwara in Kabul in Afghanistan.
The name is Abu Khalid al-Hindi.
The picture along with the claim has been released by Khaama Press
news agency in Afghanistan. The report dated March 27 states: “The
offshoot of the Islamic State terror group, ISIS Khurasan, claimed that the
attack on Sikh temple in Kabul was carried out by Abu Khalild al-Hindi. The Amaq News
Agency, affiliated with the terror group released the photo of the suicide
bomber who stormed the Sikh temple in Kabul city on Wednesday. The terror group
also issued a brief statement claiming that the Sikh minority group was the
target of the attack.”
The story
is headlined “Abu Khalid al-Hindi carried out the attack on Sikh temple
in Kabul: ISIS-K”.
The media coverage of the terrorist attack on a Gurdwara in Kabul
in Afghanistan killing 25 Sikh men, women and children indicate some deeper
design rather than just being an action against a minority.
The number of Sikh families in Afghanistan is about 300. Many of
them had shifted during Taliban regime when they too were singled out.
The reports carried by the Al Jazeera, the Washington Post, the
Hindustan Times and the Jalandhar based Punjabi Daily Ajit are important in
this context and provide some insight into the dynamics.
The
Al Jazeera reported on March 25: “The attack on Wednesday was claimed by the
ISIL (ISIS) armed group. Earlier, the Taliban armed group denied it was behind
the siege that left at least eight others wounded”.
The
Indian newspaper Hindustan Times stated on March 25: “Gunmen stormed a
religious gathering of Afghanistan’s minority Sikhs in their place of worship
(gurdwara) in the heart of Kabul’s old city on Wednesday, killing 25 people. Within
hours, the Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the attack”.
On
the first day of the reporting, every newspaper carried the claim of the ISIS
owning responsibility for the attack. The militant organisation did not give
any explanation for targeting the Sikhs.
The
perception of Taliban and ISIS differ on the issue of minorities.
The
AP report in Washington Post dated March
26 is important in this context. It states: “The Islamic State affiliate in
Afghanistan claimed responsibility for the attack on the group’s Amaq media
arm, according to SITE Intelligence Group, which tracks militant postings and
groups. The gunmen was identified as Indian national Abu Khalid al-Hindi.”
It
is in the context of the ISIS claim with follow up by AP that the subsequent
reports appearing in a section of the Indian media are crucial from many
aspects.
The
Hindustan Times said on March 26: “According to
information reaching Delhi from Afghan and western security agencies, the
strike was ordered by Quetta Shura of Taliban at the behest of Pakistani deep
state with the larger motive of driving out India from Afghanistan….The
entire operation was code-named Blackstar by the Pakistan intelligence, which
used the Haqqani network led by Taliban’s deputy commander Sirrajuddin Haqqani and elements of LeT…. Since the US announced a
deal with the Taliban on February 29, there has been a spurt in violence in
Afghanistan with resurgence of the Haqqani network and relocation of terror
camps of both LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammed from Pakistan…According to
counter-terror analysts, the Haqqani network comprises mainly of Zardan tribe
based in Nangarhar, Khost, Nuristan and Kunar provinces, which is in direct
conflict with the miniscule Sikh community over land in Jalalabad and trade in
Kabul.”
The
Hindustan Times report was headlined “Haqqani, Lashkar terrorists behind
attack, Intel reports”.
What
is all the more important that the Daily Ajit also carries the same headline the
same day indicating the involvement of these two militant organisations. One
report is from Delhi and the other is datelined Jalandhar.
What
an interesting coincidence. These are not spot reports but based upon sources and carry the same headline.
Earlier,
both the Hindustan Times and the Ajit had carried the same day the gunning down
of Khalistan Liberation Force leader Harmeet Singh alias Happy PhD near Lahore
in Pakistan on January 20, 2020.
Within
hours of the Kabul attack, it is the reaction of the media team and some leaders
from the BJP and the Sangh Parivar that is equally important. The BJP brigade tried to chastise the Sikh
community in India in the context of the Langar served by the Sikhs to the Muslim
women protesters sitting on dharna at Shaheen Bagh in Delhi. The effort by this
brigade was to create a wedge between the Sikhs from the Muslims.
The
Sikhs by and large have support the minorities in this struggle against the CAA
of which the Shaheen Bagh has become a symbol. The Sikhs and the Muslims have
been coming together after Pakistan accepted the Sikh demand for Kartarpur
Sahib Corridor. Going by Punjab police chief Dinkar Gupta, India has security
concerns in the context of this corridor.
The
ISIS is not part of the deal entered into by USA with Taliban in Afghanistan in
which Pakistan has played a strategic role. India was side-lined in the
process. The ISIS and Taliban are the two competing forces in Afghanistan.
It
is in this context that the Sikhs could have become target in the strategic
power play in the region.
Pertinent
to mention here is the massacre of the Sikhs in Chattisinghpora in Jammu and
Kashmir on March 20, 2000 in which 35
persons were gunned down. That action was part of some deeper design.
Comments
Post a Comment