Skip to main content

CBI by constituting SIT over-rules Punjab Assembly resolution on Bargari probe, Speaker can take notice



Punjab Assembly Speaker can take suo  motto notice of House contempt by CBI in Bargari probe

Jagtar Singh

The decision of the CBI to constitute special investigating team to probe the cases relating to sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib at Bargari and related incidents nullifies the unanimous resolution adopted by the Punjab Assembly after a 7-hour debate on August 28, 2018 that was boycotted by the Akali Dal, the party that was in power when these incidents rocked the state in 2015. Punjab withdrew the probe from the CBI following this resolution.
The investigation to the CBI was handed over by the Akali Dal government.
The CBI informed the special court at Mohali yesterday about the decision to constitute the SIT saying the basis for handing over the probe was the letter earlier written by Punjab Bureau of Investigation chief Prabodh Kumar. This letter was written objecting to the closure report filed by the central probe agency. It is significant that it is Prabodh Kumar who heads the 5-member SIT that was constituted by the Punjab government following the resolution adopted by the Assembly. The CBI probe was supposed to have been withdrawn following the letter written by the Punjab government to that effect after constituting the 5-member SIT that is now non-functional due to sharp differences among members.
Now the court would decide on this step taken by the CBI at the next hearing on October 30 in view of the closure report filed earlier.
The CBI decision to constitute the SIT  and that too on the basis of the letter written by Punjab officer concerned is multidimensional.
Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh on Thursday reacted strongly to the CBI decision saying, “They are obliged in law to hand over all the papers to us so that, as desired by the Vidhan Sabha, our SIT can take things in their own hand, and what they could not do in three years, the state police may be able to do in a shorter period”.
His reaction is appropriate except the fact that he had earlier justified the letter written by Prabodh Kumar on behalf of the government to the CBI to continue with the probe as several aspects were involved.
He said in his interview that appeared in an English daily on September 24, “Prabodh did the right thing. If he had not written to the CBI and told them they have no business to file the closure report, the case would have been over. He did the correct thing by writing to them”.
Here is from his same statement, “Even as the state government formally contested, in court, the CBI’s decision to hand over the Bargari investigation to a Special Investigation Team (SIT), the Chief Minister said the CBI, clearly acting under pressure from the central government at the behest of the Badals, was quite obviously trying to stop the probe from going forward. The decision to hand over the case to a new SIT three months after it had filed a closure report in court was a clear ploy to delay the probe and stop the state government from taking over”.
And the CBI has justified its decision citing this very letter written by Prabodh Kumar that the Chief Minister justified two days back. Then where is the problem?
The second dimension is that of contempt of the Assembly as the CBI has over-ruled the resolution adopted by the House to withdraw probe from the CBI.
Rules 252 to  262 deal with the issue of Privilege and the contempt falls under this section. Normally, the notice has to be given to the Speaker raising the issue of contempt or privilege.
However, Rule 262 can be interpreted to mean that the Speaker can take suo motto notice. It states, “Notwithstanding anything contained in these Rules, the Speaker may refer any question of privilege  to the Committee of Privileges for examination, investigation or report”.
The CBI decision to constitute SIT to probe Bargari probe is contempt of the House of which the Speaker can take suo motto notice.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act
Post a Comment
Read more

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik
Post a Comment
Read more

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio
Post a Comment
Read more