Skip to main content

CBI by constituting SIT over-rules Punjab Assembly resolution on Bargari probe, Speaker can take notice



Punjab Assembly Speaker can take suo  motto notice of House contempt by CBI in Bargari probe

Jagtar Singh

The decision of the CBI to constitute special investigating team to probe the cases relating to sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib at Bargari and related incidents nullifies the unanimous resolution adopted by the Punjab Assembly after a 7-hour debate on August 28, 2018 that was boycotted by the Akali Dal, the party that was in power when these incidents rocked the state in 2015. Punjab withdrew the probe from the CBI following this resolution.
The investigation to the CBI was handed over by the Akali Dal government.
The CBI informed the special court at Mohali yesterday about the decision to constitute the SIT saying the basis for handing over the probe was the letter earlier written by Punjab Bureau of Investigation chief Prabodh Kumar. This letter was written objecting to the closure report filed by the central probe agency. It is significant that it is Prabodh Kumar who heads the 5-member SIT that was constituted by the Punjab government following the resolution adopted by the Assembly. The CBI probe was supposed to have been withdrawn following the letter written by the Punjab government to that effect after constituting the 5-member SIT that is now non-functional due to sharp differences among members.
Now the court would decide on this step taken by the CBI at the next hearing on October 30 in view of the closure report filed earlier.
The CBI decision to constitute the SIT  and that too on the basis of the letter written by Punjab officer concerned is multidimensional.
Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh on Thursday reacted strongly to the CBI decision saying, “They are obliged in law to hand over all the papers to us so that, as desired by the Vidhan Sabha, our SIT can take things in their own hand, and what they could not do in three years, the state police may be able to do in a shorter period”.
His reaction is appropriate except the fact that he had earlier justified the letter written by Prabodh Kumar on behalf of the government to the CBI to continue with the probe as several aspects were involved.
He said in his interview that appeared in an English daily on September 24, “Prabodh did the right thing. If he had not written to the CBI and told them they have no business to file the closure report, the case would have been over. He did the correct thing by writing to them”.
Here is from his same statement, “Even as the state government formally contested, in court, the CBI’s decision to hand over the Bargari investigation to a Special Investigation Team (SIT), the Chief Minister said the CBI, clearly acting under pressure from the central government at the behest of the Badals, was quite obviously trying to stop the probe from going forward. The decision to hand over the case to a new SIT three months after it had filed a closure report in court was a clear ploy to delay the probe and stop the state government from taking over”.
And the CBI has justified its decision citing this very letter written by Prabodh Kumar that the Chief Minister justified two days back. Then where is the problem?
The second dimension is that of contempt of the Assembly as the CBI has over-ruled the resolution adopted by the House to withdraw probe from the CBI.
Rules 252 to  262 deal with the issue of Privilege and the contempt falls under this section. Normally, the notice has to be given to the Speaker raising the issue of contempt or privilege.
However, Rule 262 can be interpreted to mean that the Speaker can take suo motto notice. It states, “Notwithstanding anything contained in these Rules, the Speaker may refer any question of privilege  to the Committee of Privileges for examination, investigation or report”.
The CBI decision to constitute SIT to probe Bargari probe is contempt of the House of which the Speaker can take suo motto notice.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Damage to institution of Akal Takht symbolising Sikh sovereignty more important dimension of current crisis in Sikh domain

  Ideological Damage to Akal Takht most important dimension of Akali Crisis Ground Zero By Jagtar Singh The Sikh religio-political discourse entered a new phase on Baisakhi 2025 — the historic day on which Guru Gobind Singh, in 1699, created the Khalsa at Anandpur Sahib, completing the ideological foundation laid by Guru Nanak Dev, the founder of the Sikh faith. Significant developments emerged from the well-attended Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) conference held at Takht Sri Damdama Sahib on April 13. It was the first major public appearance of Sukhbir Singh Badal since his re-election as party president on April 12, marking his return to the helm after a brief interregnum. Sukhbir, who first succeeded his father, Parkash Singh Badal, as party president in 2008, resumes leadership of a party long dominated by the Badal family—an influence that has spanned over three decades, the longest in the SAD’s history. For months, the religio-political landscape of Punjab has remained i...

Akal Takht intervenes to reset Sikh religio-political discourse

  Akal Takht intervenes to reset Sikh religio-political discourse Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh, Dec 8: The Sikh religio-political domain has the tendency to dictate religio-political discourse of Punjab whose polity is different from other regions in the country. This is the state where a national dynamic minority is in majority. This minority was the third entity in all the political negotiations leading to India’s independence. What happened in Punjab on December 2 has to be reviewed in this backdrop as this development is going to have far-reaching impact not only on the future of the Shiromani Akali Dal but also the political tendencies at several levels. It is pertinent to mention at this stage itself that the Sikh religio-political discourse is presently affecting even India’s geo-politics, especially in the American sub-continent in the context of the activities of a section of the Sikh Diaspora. December 2 was unprecedented in the history of more than a c...

Killing of Sidhu Moosewala is chilling reminder that all is not well with Punjab but not the time to indulge in blame game

  Something continues to be wrong with Punjab going by killing of Sidhu Moosewala Ground Zero Jagtar Singh   The killing of  Punjabi pop star Shubhdeep Singh Sidhu popular as Sidhu Moosewala is more than shocking. It has not only numbed Punjab but has triggered shock waves across the seas. The only inference that can be drawn from this tragic end of a young icon is that something is not right with Punjab, despite illusion created by degenerated political elite of so called normalcy. It is the system that has to return to normalcy. It has not. The unabated degeneration in the system at times tend to play havoc. This is not the time to play blame game. Rather this is the time to rise above parochial political interests. Punjab needs consensus to facilitate the return of this historically disturbed state and the injured psyche to return to normalcy. And it is not an easy task. What Punjab lacks at this juncture is a role model. After all, Punjab is not a state like any other...