Jagtar Singh
Unlike militancy in Punjab, the
struggle in Kashmir has two dimensions.
The political
struggle was triggered to maintain status quo under Article 370 that accorded
special status to what earlier was the state of Jammu and Kashmir that acceded
to India under treaty of accession. The Assembly elections rigged by Delhi over
time to install stooges and in 1989 in particular was one of the reasons that
sparked the armed struggle as the second dimension.
In Punjab, the armed struggle initially was for the
implementation of the Anandpur Sahib Resolution of 1973 on which the agitation
had been launched on August 4, 1982 by the Shiromani Akali Dal and taken over
by Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale. The two struggles were going on in
different political spaces.
In Kashmir, despite the fact that Article 370 has not been
the agenda of militants, the struggles have been complementary.
Despite other avenues available and the last minute talks,
the army attack on Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple) complex code-named Operation
Bluestar in the first week of June 1984 was ordered to break the will of the
Sikhs by insulting and humiliating them.
It was planned in such a way that the generals at the top who
executed this design of the Indian State were the Sikhs.
A strip was pasted on the historic gat of Darshani Deodi of
Darbar Sahib with three words written in caps- UNDER ARMY OCCUPATION- after the
operation was over on June 6. (Jagtar Singh: Khalistan Struggle A Non-movement,
p 7)
The ruling Congress strategized the humiliation of the Sikhs
first in November 1982 during Asiad in Delhi. The Sikhs, men and women, passing
though Haryana from every side were subjected to insults and humiliation. This
is a matter of record.
The Sikhs in the border areas faced humiliation in the
aftermath of Operation Bluestar during Operation Woodrose under which search
operations were launched in the countryside by the armed forces. Entire village
would be made to stand out in the open under hot June sun as part of the search
operations. Most of the young Sikhs crossed over to Pakistan during that
period.
The Sikhs, however, had never taken the position that they
were not Indians.
It is different in case of Kashmir. It was the so called
mainstream leadership propped up by Delhi that was of Kashmiri Indians. It is
that very leadership that has now been detained, pushing them to the camp of the
Azadi demanding Kashmiris.
There might be several statements of these leaders including
Farooq Abdullah supporting the cause of Hurriyat. But then so was the case with
Parkash Singh Badal in Punjab whose statements are on record in favour of the
militants. He also signed the memorandum demanding Khalistan submitted to the
United Nations.
The mainstream political leaders sailing in two boats as
part of the tactics to survive in the states where such struggles are going on
is normal.
Armed struggle in Kashmir is backed by mass support and it
is in this context that the strategy to break the will of the people comes in.
Kashmiris have been subjected total domination by the
security forces since August 5. Although denied by the official spokespersons,
reports have appeared of the way people have been subjected to humiliation.
Offering lollypops after humiliating them is unlikely to achieve the desired
results.
India witnessed massive development by way of railways and
highways under British rule. One section of Indians sided with the rulers and that
has happened in the history of this region all along. Development is not the
anti-dote to political ambitions of the people.
Kashmir continues to be far from normal despite the claims
of traffic jams by a section of the pro-government media.
The unfortunate part of this narrative is that majority of people
in rest of India (except Punjab) are virtually celebrating what can be
described as the subjugation of Kashmiris.
It is only when ‘normalcy’ is restored that it would be
known whether the will of the Kashmiris to fight has been broken or not.
At the level of the human rights, however, Kashmir is
getting globalised with total support from the radical Sikh organisations.
Comments
Post a Comment