Skip to main content

At stake in Bargari sacrilege narrative is credibility of Capt Amarinder Singh in Sikh domain



Jagtar Singh

Two interviews of Punjab Chief Minister Capt Amarinder Singh in the same paper within four days but by two different reporters in the rank of editor.
In both the interviews, the headline relates to Bargari sacrilege.
Headline on September 24, 2019:
Badal not involved in sacrilege, no timeframe on SIT.
Headline on September 28 in the same paper:
Akalis definitely trying to scuttle Bargari probe, clearly have something to hide.
In-between on September 25, the same paper carried banner headline on Punjab page:
Capt comes under fire, govt in damage control. This story also carried clarification from the Chief Minister who asserted the headline on September 24 was misleading and there was nothing like giving clean chit to  Parkash Singh Badal. Despite this clarification, the same paper carried another interview but by Delhi journalist.
Clearly, the Bargari sacrilege narrative continues to dominate religio-political discourse in this sensitive border state. And this issue is likely to continue to dictate the political discourse till 2022 when the next Assembly elections are due. It is also a good diversion from perception of non-governance.
The Bargari narrative goes back to 2015 when  Badal headed the Akali Dal-BJP alliance in Punjab with his son Sukhbir Singh Badal as the deputy chief minister.
The issue relates to theft of the Bir of Guru Granth Sahib from village Burj Jawahar Singh Wala on June 1, 2015 whose pages were found scattered in the streets of the adjoining Bargari village in the morning of October 12. Two  posters had earlier appeared in abusive language challenging the Sikhs to recover Guru Granth Sahib that was claimed to be hidden in Bargari and it carried the signature line of the controversial Dera Sacha Sauda. The Badal government had failed to act.
A section within the ruling Congress is openly dissatisfied and this section includes cabinet colleagues of Capt Amarinder Singh, besides a group of MLAs. Former state Congress chief and Rajya Sabha member Partap Singh Bajwa too has chipped in to take advantage of the situation.
The basic issue is confusion that has been caused mainly with Capt Amarinder Singh changing his position on the same very issue over time and all this is on the record and pointed out earlier in detail and need not be repeated here.
One has to go back to history to understand the political fall-out of such issues. Badal was the chief minister when the Sikh-Nirankari confrontation took place on April 13, 1978 at Amritsar in which 13 Sikhs were killed. Badal came under sharp attack  for soft-pedalling the issue. Despite having been the chief minister of Punjab for a record five times, that taint has not been cleared.
At one level, Capt Amarinder Singh is now in the same situation as he is being perceived to be in mix up with the Badal family. It is two well known that the Badal family continues to command power in the state. The perception of this complicit politics is now deep rooted among the people in the state.
Bargari issue needs closure.
The CBI was  probing only three cases relating to Bargari sacrilege. The probe from the CBI was withdrawn by the state government following unanimous resolution passed in the Assembly. That did not happen.
However, the SIT that was formed by the state government after withdrawing case from the CBI is focussed mainly on firing at Kotkapura and Behbal Kalan. The problem is that this 5-member SIT stands divided and that has impacted the probe. Two chargesheets have been filed by the two groups in the SIT. Has Capt Amarinder Singh resolved this contentious issue so that the investigation is taken to the logical conclusion rather than getting embroiled in the CBI issue?
The political elite must realise that this issue would continue to haunt them if not taken to logical conclusion.  
Capt Amarinder Singh is perceived to be a better Sikh than the Badals.
At stake in Sikh religio-political matrix is Capt Amarinder Singh’s own credibility. It is his choice to maintain that perception among the Sikhs or not.
Punjab is history of the Sikhs.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio