Skip to main content

India should be concerned over Sikh and Kashmiri hardliners joining hands. Rewarding Sukhbir Badal is not the appropriate counter.



As Sikh bodies support Kashmiris, BJP projects Sukhbir Badal as chief minister

Here is the quid pro quo.
As hard-line Sikh bodies in Punjab and some other countries observed India’s Independence Day as the Black Day and came out in solidarity with the Kashmiris, the Bharatiya Janata Party the same day projected Akali Dal president Sukhbir Singh Badal as the next chief minister.
Akali Dal Badal is in alliance with the BJP.
It can’t be dismissed as just off the cuff remark from state BJP president Shwait Malik.
The occasion was Akali Dal’s annual conference on Rakhar Puniya at Baba Bakala in Amritsar district on Independence Day that the BJP normally used to give a miss.
The Dal Khalsa, Akali Dal (Amritsar) and the United Akali Dal staged protests at several district headquarters that day to observe Independence Day as the Black Day. The  political agenda of Dal Khalsa is Khalistan through democratic means. Akali Dal (Amritsar) president Simranjit Singh Mann too raises this demand but off and on.
Although the Dal Khalsa has been observing this day as the Black Day for so many years, it is for the first time that black flag protests were staged by Sikh activists in several districts. This body used to be alone earlier. Significantly, Panjab University, Chandigarh students council president Kanupriya also attended the protest in Amritsar. She is from the Left stream.
The protest by these Sikh organisations was also against revocation of Article 370 that accorded special status to Jammu and Kashmir. Besides its scrapping, this turbulent border state has been bifurcated and further downgraded as two union territories to complete the process of assimilation. The state has been under lockdown since then with heaviest ever presence of the armed forces in the already garrisoned state.
The Sikh bodies in London and Washington joined hands with Kashmiris to stage demonstrations outside Indian high commission and embassy. The protest in London was particularly aggressive.
It may be mentioned that Sikh mobilisations are being witnessed for the last some years in countries like UK, USA and Canada on the issue of separate Sikh state.
There is also an irony in this demand as it is Indian Punjab that is to become Khalistan as per this agenda. The land of birth of the Sikh religion that is Nankana Sahib, however, is in Pakistan and this aspect is not talked about.
India is learnt to be concerned about radical Sikhs and Kashmiris joining hands as Punjab was hit by armed struggle earlier that was commanded by Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale in Phase I. Both Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir share border with Pakistan. Both these states are strategically located.
The projection of Sukhbir Singh Badal as the future chief minister is in this particular context.
Shiromani Akali Dal for decades has been articulating the Sikh concerns but not anymore. This second oldest party in the country   contested the 1967 Assembly election raising the demand for Sikhstan on the pattern of special status granted to Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370.
The Anandpur Sahib Resolution of 1973 on which the Akali Dal launched the Dharamyudh Morcha on August 4, 1982 during which thousands of Sikhs went to jails is essentially rewording of 1967 articulation that was based in 1966  resolution. It may be mentioned that the agenda of militant leader Sant Bhindranwale too was the implementation of Anandpur Sahib Resolution “without any dilution”. He led armed struggle on this very agenda; at least this was what he used to say on record as he never called for Khalistan.
Sukhbir repositioned his party on Article 370 in the Lok Sabha during discussion on its revocation. Earlier, the party position used to be articulated by the party and not by any individual. However, that democratic approach ended after Parkash Singh Badal took over the party in 1995. Now this grand old party stands reduced to House of Badals. BJP has lost no time in reciprocating his crucial support. Akali Dal is the only party perceived to represent a minority that is in alliance with the BJP.
The Sikh stream is witnessing two streaks on Article 370. In the process, House of Badals seems to be getting further isolated from the Sikh support base. Earlier, it was the issue of sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib that had hit the party and the Akali Dal is still to recover from that damage.
However, Sukhbir has consolidated his position within the matrix of Akali Dal-BJP alliance.
The BJP need not look for a Sikh face in Punjab.
The Abdullahs and Muftis played this role for decades in Jammu and Kashmir.
Punjab is now the only state dominated by a minority.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio