Skip to main content

Can loss of Kashmiri identity be compensated with promise of faster development?


Compensating loss of Kashmiri identity with promise of faster development

Sikhs in Punjab felt cheated when Akali Dal president Sant Harchand Singh Longowal entered into unconditional accord with Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in July 1985 within three months of his release from jail. This was  more than a year after Operation Bluestar, the code name for army attack on Darbar Sahib (Golden Temple) in Amritsar beginning June 4, 1984 after imposing 72-hour curfew in the region.
The terms of engagement had changed by then and this was not realised while signing this accord.
The Accord promised compensation to innocent persons killed in Punjab “in agitation or any action” after August 1, 1982. This also included compensation for property damaged will also be paid. The second point of settlement was merit being the sole criterion of recruitment to the armed forces rather than the state quota. These promises were besides transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab and referring the issue of river waters allocation to a tribunal.
Sant Longowal was gunned down on August 20 within less than two months of signing the Accord that finally was consigned to the dustbin of history as the only issue on which action was initiated was construction of Satluj Yamuna Canal to carry water from Punjab rivers to Haryana. Senior Akali Dal leader Parkash Singh Badal did not attend Sant Longowal’s death anniversary for nine years.
Reference to Punjab in the context of what is happening in Kashmir is called for as both are neighbouring states, both share border with Pakistan and both these states (now only one state) were dominated by minority- Muslims and the Sikhs. Both share militancy.  Moreover, centre is concerned about the mercurial situation in Punjab too  in view of the radical Sikh politics, especially among the Diaspora.
Kashmiris, who have lost their identity, have been promised loads of development. Jammu and Kashmir stands obliterated as a state from the map of India having been reduced to the status of a union territory. Lots of promises were made on the development front by Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself last night in his Address to the nation.
The Kashmiris should have been happy today and should have celebrated. They have not. They have been promised more employment too. Interesting, unemployment is going up in the country.
The narrative that is being constructed around the thesis of development is very important. Reducing a state to the level of a union territory in the name of faster development is now the new development model. Earlier, big states were bifurcated, even trifurcated, for higher development. That narrative stands reversed.
Moreover, now any state can be reduced to union territory through what can be termed as constitutional dictatorship.
Development is the primary responsibility of those who are elected by the people to ‘serve’ them. In practice, they govern than with colonial mentality that India inherited in 1947. Development is not a favour to be showered on the people. The promises made to the people in Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh have to be seen in this context.
There is another irony in the case of Jammu and Kashmir on the development front. The state has been under President’s rule and hence under the centre directly for months. For all practical purpose, a state under President’s rule is a union territory. Punjab has the record of having been under President’s rule continuously from May 1987 to March 1992. Where were the hurdles in fastening the pace of development in Jammu and Kashmir all these months?
Moreover, the BJP governed the state in alliance with PDP before that government was unceremoniously sacked. What stopped the BJP from accelerating development process then?
People in the Valley are in a shock and the state stands divided on this issue although loss of identity concerns every Kashmiri.
With a single stroke,  a major section of the pro-India people in the political spectrum of Jammu and Kashmir has been rendered irrelevant. Continuation of Article 370 was never an issue with the militants and that narrative remains unchanged.
Moreover, it is the Jammu region that might attract investment rather than the Valley. Punjabis are always in search of cheaper land in other states.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension

  With India pausing trade talks with Canada, Khalistan narrative assume new dimension Ground Zero Jagtar Singh The decades old Khalistan narrative relating to an independent Sikh state has, for the first time, impacted India’s international relations. Pakistan is in different category. Going by the media reports, India has suspended trade talks with Canada, the country that is the most sought after by the youth from Punjab, the region where the issue of Khalistan is the most vibrant. Canada, as per these reports, has “indefinitely postponed a trade mission to India scheduled for October”. Though no direct reference has been made, tension has escalated between the two countries on the issue of Khalistan. Earlier, India has been accusing neighbouring Pakistan for aiding and abetting Sikh separatists in this part of Punjab. But one can’t choose a neighbour. However, Canada is not a neighbour and hence is in a different category. But then Indian settlers abroad being act

Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India

  Lacking vocal support in Punjab, globalized Khalistan narrative continues to concern India Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Chandigarh: One of the stories associated with sidelines of G20 front-paged by the media is the meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi had with his Canadian counterpart Justin Trudeau whose focus was intensified activities of the secessionists who happen to be migrants of Indian origin. In simple and straight terms, the issue was the activities of those demanding setting up of Khalistan in Indian Punjab. Neither the demand for Khalistan nor the narrative between India and Canada   is new. Thousands of people died in Punjab including innocents and hundreds of those killed by security forces in fake encounters in the armed struggle that got triggered with the gunning down of Nirankari chief Gurbachan Singh on April 24, 1980 in Delhi by then unknown ordinary Sikh Ranjit Singh accompanied by Kabul Singh from Damdami Taksal. This was to avenge the killing of 13 Sik

As Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produced Horror of Manipur, battle has to be ideological

  Institutionalization of politics of polarisation produces Horror of Manipur Ground Zero Jagtar Singh Who is responsible for the horror of Manipur? This question might seem ridiculous after the arrest of some perpetrators of this crime against humanity. It is not. The issue is that of the roots. There is also a reason as to why the expression of shame at the top was not unqualified. There is a reason as to why a dominant section in India is trying to unjustly legitimize horror of Manipur by citing examples of crimes against women in West Bengal, Rajasthan and some other non-BJP rules states. It is not that the country has witnessed such horror for the first time since 1947. This happened in November 1984 on the streets of the national capital that is Delhi and several other cities in the country. The victims then were the Sikhs. This happened in 2002 in Gujarat. The victims were the Muslims. At the root was politics of hate. The Congress used politics of communalizatio